Operational Process Automation
Running the repeating back-office work — data entry, document preparation, transfers and reporting — while approval, exceptions and rollback stay with a person.
The most expensive work in a business is the work nobody notices: entering the same fact into two systems, compiling the same report by hand every month, moving an incoming document from one folder to another. Taken one at a time they look small, but they repeat every week and none of them has an owner.
We do not make the automation decision before that list exists. Without writing down how often a step repeats, how long it takes and what happens when it goes wrong, there is no way to know which step is worth automating. For some steps the right answer is not automation but removing the step altogether.
The measure during a build is not speed but reversibility. How a wrong result from an automated step gets noticed and how it gets undone is written in advance. An error that goes uncaught costs more than doing the work by hand, because manual work gets it wrong slowly and automation gets it wrong quickly.
What this service covers
Scope is bounded by the software you already run: if accounting, stock, booking, the e-commerce panel, email and spreadsheet files can be connected, the flow is built on top of them. If a piece of software has no connection point we discuss that first; keeping the scope narrow from the start is a deliberate choice.
Process map and repetition count
We write the work to be automated step by step: trigger, information needed, who does the step, where the output goes. The weekly repetition count and what happens when the step goes wrong are recorded for each one. Scope is chosen from that table, not from a wish list.
Cross-system data transfer
The points where the same fact is typed into two places by hand become a defined transfer. We decide which field is the master record in which system, and write down which one wins in a conflict.
Document and form preparation
Repeating documents — quotes, contract drafts, invoice attachments, patient or customer forms — are filled from recorded data. The document is prepared and queued; sending and signing stay with a person.
Reporting and regular summaries
Weekly and monthly reports compiled by hand are produced from defined sources. Which record each number in the report came from can be inspected; a metric whose source cannot be shown does not go into the report.
Error detection, logging and rollback
Every automated action is logged with a timestamp. When an unexpected value arrives the flow stops and notifies the owner; how a wrong action gets undone is part of the build rather than a request added afterwards.
How we work through it
Timing depends on how many systems have to be connected and how many exceptions the process carries. The schedule below describes a typical start.
- Stage 1 — first week
Work inventory
We list the jobs the team repeats each week exactly as they are. The most common finding at this stage is the intermediate steps nobody owns but everybody performs.
- Stage 2 — weeks 2-3
Choosing a single flow
One flow is picked from the list: frequently repeated, clearly ruled and reversible when it goes wrong. Getting one flow right instead of opening three at once lowers both the error count and the build time.
- Stage 3 — weeks 3-6
Running in parallel
The new flow runs alongside the existing method for a while and the two outputs are compared. The old method is not switched off before the accuracy of the new flow has been seen.
- Stage 4 — ongoing
Monitoring and upkeep
Error logs are reviewed regularly and changed regulations, prices and process details are updated. When a connected piece of software changes its interface, the flow has to be updated as well.
Where approval and decisions stay with a person
The boundary of the automation is written at the start. On the items below the system prepares and a person decides and approves:
- Money movement: payment, refund, invoicing and collection steps never complete automatically. The system calculates the amount and prepares the document, approval stays with a person.
- Contracts and official documents: the draft is filled from recorded data, sending and signing happen on human approval. Which record the draft was produced from is logged as well.
- Deletion and irreversible actions: no flow is ever given permanent delete rights. Records are only flagged, and the qualified person decides.
- Exceptions and unexpected values: whenever something falls outside the rule the flow stops and notifies the owner. We do not build a “guess if unsure” setting.
- Work bound by regulation — tax, health records, personnel files — is automated only at the preparation stage; filing and approval stay with the qualified person.
What we measure
Measurement is not built on “how many actions were automated” but on whether the work closes correctly and on time:
- The weekly repetition count of the chosen flow and how much of it completed without passing through a person.
- The number of times the flow stopped and fell into an exception; a rising exception count usually points at a gap in the rule.
- The number of points where the same fact is still entered into two systems separately — lowering that number is the purpose of the build.
- How long the report takes to be ready and whether its numbers can be traced back to their source.
- The number of actions that had to be rolled back and how long the rollback took.
Frequently Asked Questions
Let us count which work actually repeats
We list the jobs your team repeats every week and work out which of them is worth automating and which should stay exactly as it is.
Get in touch